It is a story that correctly restricts the level of the sound before it says of commenting on tone quality. 'is the voice level calibration of your bureau correctly restricted?
 

The standard of the sound in broadcasting and the recording is important. Very, and a check and a usual confirmation in an analog age in old times, etc. of the sending level. There seems to be a person who has emitted the sound without yet knowing the reference value because there is a critical point now of a digital generation though it became easy to find the reference value, too. Be of the recording and sending at the level of an asunder each bureau (each one) when listening to the WEB radio etc. of the Internet like the current state. If it is a thing that happens because there is no thing that becomes the standard of the sound, and each one has the standard of a correct sound, the level of a steady sound is kept. Does the listener who is the listener think that an unstable broadcasting not to be able to separate the hand according to the volume of the radio is beside the question in the story before getting it hearing it, and has your bureau output a correct volume? The test tape and the record (CD is included) are put always near oneself and it is used to confirm the level of the sound on the site of broadcasting and the recording. This test source exists from the cassette to all opening/disk record/DAT/CD/MD if only the sound is said.
An analog test tape is not in the copy of the dubbing etc. and becomes very expensive because of a unitary recording. WildCat FM has the test sound sources such as the desk records and 19/38, cassettes, and opening CD/MD as a sound source for which these test sources are necessary first as Broadcast Station. It is needless to say to cannot output the standard of a correct
sound if there is no scale of the sound. It is not a translation that each broadcasting station has sent the signal sound of 1000Hz or 400Hz before the start of the broadcasting that is a basic adjustment of the correct restriction of the level of the sound and sending for the meaning not to exist and either to send the signal.

It is a funny tale that it is not found even if a correct test source searches as long as I know for where of the Internet, and the one that becomes the standard of the recording reproduction of WAV is necessary even for the WEB radio etc. of the Internet in the recording reproduction done with PC for the WEB radio etc. though it is necessary to scold having naturally.
 
 

The peak value of the same as CD of the EIA standard and positive full-scale is a value of/&h7FFF and 32767 negative peak value -32767/&h8001, this value becomes 0dB of the truth, and the signal source generated from the numeric character data digitally is necessary for 16Bit/44.1KHz sampling of WAV so that accuracy's not going out in the thing that the external is recorded (copy) may fill accuracy as the test sound source that is a natural thing to keep the accuracy of the sound.
 

When the WAV signal of 1KHz/0dB generated digitally is seen with TWE, such feeling.

 

There is no change in accuracy because it is a digital signal even if it sees with CoolEdit2000.

 
 
 

it is such feeling as the reproduction with WaveSpectra. Isn't neither there distortion because it is a signal source generated digitally, isn't noise, and is it natural? Dynamic range is 115dB theoretically? as long as it reproduces with infinity and WaveSpectra. Is it about 120dB?
 

The thing that is a high-quality signal can be similarly confirmed also with the analyzer of CoolEdit2000.
 

...translation.. this time, at the time of say the level restriction of the done recording reproduction can be corrected by PC. It is possible to do in accordance with the EIA standard as previously mentioned, and the made test source is the level though it is a story of the test source. What is from the level check of the recording reproduction to the measurement of the frequency response of the sound board of PC, and? it is very and . though thought it is useful. !??